Pardon me?
Just answer me this; was I given the right to due process? Or, was it easier to believe what they provided a single piece of evidence to coroberate? Was it more convenient to hang me out to dry? Was it beneficial to you and your's in some way, to deny me the benefit of the doubt? Perhaps, there was some inkling of an ulterior motive? A slight bias, to oppress me? A desire to see me fail? Would it be safe to say, you knew it would benefit you, to debase me?
For someone to come out on top, it means someone has to win, and someone has to be the first place loser. Except, in all actuality, you had already won, but your need to exert dominance won, too. Being better wasn't good enough, you had to prove you could outmaneuver me. Outsmart me. And, just leave me out.
And to think, I only wanted to make the world a better place than I found it. I wanted to live by the golden rule. I wanted to go down in history for the positive influence I had. Too bad I wasn't as cutthroat as you, I'd have been baaaaad. What can you say to prove, being immoral was the righteous way to the top? What can you say to defend how you thought?

Comments
Post a Comment