IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
PAUL RAYMOND THERIAULT
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
Case No.: [ ]
COMPLAINT
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Plaintiff, [PAUL RAYMOND THERIAULT], brings this complaint to address violations of federal law, improper seizure of property, fraudulent activities, and abuse of authority involving federal actors or those acting under federal jurisdiction.
2. This case arises from predatory conduct, conflicts of interest, and deliberate actions that deprived Plaintiff of personal property and fundamental rights under the law. Plaintiff seeks relief for the tortuous and inhumane treatment endured as a result of these actions.
II. PARTIES
3. Plaintiff: [PAUL RAYMONDTHERIAULT], a resident of [ARIZONA], who has been directly harmed by the actions described herein.
4. Defendant: The United States of America, acting through its agents, officials, and representatives, including customs officers and other federal actors whose conduct falls under federal jurisdiction.
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1), which grants the United States Court of Federal Claims authority to hear claims against the United States founded upon the Constitution, federal laws, executive regulations, or contracts with the federal government.
6. Venue is proper in this Court as Plaintiff seeks redress for injuries caused by agents acting under federal authority and for damages resulting from improper seizure of property.
IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
7. Plaintiff was contacted by an individual claiming to be a customs officer with a callback number originating from a suspicious area code (520). Plaintiff immediately suspected fraudulent activity but proceeded to visit the border in an effort to mitigate potential harm caused by these individuals' actions.
8. Upon returning unexpectedly to Connecticut eight months later, Plaintiff learned from Della, my biological mother, that Levi, who had been left to keep the collection safe after customs told me I couldn't bring it with me), had left on the same day as Plaintiff’s departure months earlier—an act that confirmed betrayal and collusion against Plaintiff.
9. Upon arrival home, Plaintiff contacted local law enforcement in Madawaska regarding these matters but was met with further injustice when the sheriff, Mr Pelletier, who was a known competitor of Plaintiff’s father—seized Plaintiff’s collection unlawfully, knowing Plaintiff had no means to recover it.
10. The property in question was a currency collection valued as one of the world’s most significant collections, consisting of five milk crates filled with rare money painstakingly collected by Plaintiff’s father over 35 years and gifted to Plaintiff for delivery to Connecticut. The collection disappeared for several weeks before being seized by U.S. Customs without proper justification or notification.
11. The sheriff in question is the brother of Mikey Pelletier, who was formerly employed by Plaintiff’s father and had longstanding ties to Dave Chasse, Plaintiff’s mother’s long-time boyfriend.
12. Mikey Pelletier became entangled in criminal activity involving drug trafficking across the Canadian border and subsequently received a Presidential pardon under false pretenses, claiming confinement to a wheelchair since childhood—a claim that is demonstrably false based on personal knowledge.
13. Mikey Pelletier further misrepresented his financial status by alleging income from property sales despite never owning property during his lifetime—a fact confirmed through direct personal knowledge.
14. Additionally, another individual with a serious conflict of interest played a key role in transferring dozens of properties in Madawaska while serving as Town Manager—a position that inherently requires impartiality and adherence to ethical standards in municipal governance.
15. These events collectively demonstrate a pattern of fraudulent behavior, abuse of authority, and deliberate efforts to harm Plaintiff emotionally, financially, and reputationally.
V. TORTUOUS AND INHUMANE TREATMENT
16. Plaintiff has endured repeated predatory actions that have caused significant emotional distress and financial hardship. The cumulative impact of these experiences raises critical questions about how much an individual can reasonably be expected to endure before reaching their breaking point.
17. The harm inflicted upon Plaintiff is inescapable and has left indelible marks on their life, defining their experiences in ways that are unjust and deeply unfair.
18. It is tortuous and inhumane for any person to be subjected to such relentless exploitation without recourse or justice.
19. Plaintiff seeks only what every person deserves: justice that is fair, efficient, and undeniably just under the law.
VI. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
20. Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendant for:
- Improper seizure of property without due process;
- Fraudulent actions committed by individuals acting under federal authority;
- Emotional distress caused by predatory conduct;
- Violations of constitutional rights guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment (due process) and other applicable laws.
21. Defendant’s actions—or failures to act—have caused irreparable harm to Plaintiff’s life and well-being.
VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
a) Award compensatory damages for the unlawful seizure of property;
b) Provide injunctive relief preventing further predatory conduct against Plaintiff;
c) Award damages for emotional distress caused by Defendant’s agents;
d) Investigate conflicts of interest related to property transfers in Madawaska;
e) Grant any other relief deemed just and proper by this Court.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Raymond Theriault
4439 N Old Romero rd lot 33
Tucson, AZ 85705
724-769-0606
Pau1semai1@outlook.com
Comments
Post a Comment